
Group Therapy… Why I think it may be right for you
As we recover from the COVID 19 pandemic, many families are struggling. Children are facing challenges at school and at …
Read more
Therapeutic Approaches

When a parent first reaches out to us, they’ve often already tried multiple approaches—books, online strategies, school interventions—and arrived at the realization that their child needs professional support. But the next question can feel just as overwhelming: what kind of therapy? We hear this concern regularly in our practice, and it’s completely valid. The landscape of therapeutic modalities can seem like alphabet soup—CBT, DBT, ERP, play therapy—with little guidance on which approach actually fits your child’s specific situation.
This guide exists because we believe parents deserve more than definitions. You deserve a decision framework. Understanding the difference between Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Dialectical Behavior Therapy matters far less than understanding which one addresses your child’s particular struggles. A therapy type isn’t inherently “better”—it’s about match. And that match depends on your child’s age, their presenting concerns, their capacity for verbal processing, and sometimes, what’s happening within your family system.

We’ve written this as the resource we wish every parent had before their first consultation call: a clinical decision guide that maps specific concerns to appropriate modalities, explains what sessions actually look like, and gives you the questions to ask any therapist you’re considering. Our goal isn’t to replace clinical judgment—it’s to help you arrive at that conversation informed enough to participate meaningfully in the decision.
This article is designed for parents who have already recognized their child needs professional support and are now trying to evaluate options. You’re likely asking questions like:
This guide is not for parents wondering whether therapy is necessary at all, or those seeking general information about child mental health. It’s also not a substitute for clinical assessment—the nuances of your child’s presentation require professional evaluation. Instead, think of this as preparation for that evaluation, giving you the vocabulary and framework to engage productively with clinicians.
When a skilled therapist recommends a particular approach, they’re not choosing randomly. They’re weighing several interconnected factors:
Good therapists often integrate approaches—borrowing techniques from multiple modalities—but they typically have primary training in specific methods and know when that training applies. When you ask a prospective therapist “What’s your approach?” and they answer vaguely, that’s worth noting. When they can clearly explain why they’re recommending a particular modality for your child’s specific situation, that’s clinical judgment in action.
CBT operates on a foundational principle: our thoughts, feelings, and behaviors are interconnected, and by changing one element, we can shift the others. For children, this often means learning to identify anxious thoughts (“Everyone will laugh at me”), evaluate their accuracy, and develop coping strategies that interrupt avoidance patterns. According to the evidence base for cognitive behavioral therapy, this approach has strong research support for anxiety, depression, and related conditions.
Sessions are typically structured and skill-focused. Your child might complete “thought records” identifying triggering situations, their automatic thoughts, and alternative perspectives. They’ll practice coping strategies—deep breathing, cognitive reframing, problem-solving steps—and apply them between sessions through homework assignments. The therapist often involves parents in reinforcing these skills at home.
For our therapy for children ages 9-10, CBT components are often central when anxiety or mood concerns are present, as this age group can typically engage with the cognitive elements while still benefiting from concrete, visual supports.
DBT was originally developed for adults with severe emotional dysregulation and has been adapted for adolescents facing similar challenges. It’s built around a dialectic—the balance between accepting where you are while also working toward change. This approach is significantly more intensive than standard therapy and is typically reserved for higher-acuity presentations.

DBT typically involves multiple components: individual therapy sessions, skills training groups (often including parents), and between-session coaching for crisis moments. The four skill modules include:
Our therapy for adolescents and teens incorporates DBT-informed approaches when emotional regulation is the primary concern, particularly for teens whose intensity has exceeded what standard coping strategies can address.
For children under nine—and especially those under seven—play isn’t a distraction from therapy; it is therapy. Play is the primary language through which young children process experiences, express emotions, and work through conflicts they cannot verbalize. The research on play therapy effectiveness demonstrates significant reductions in anxiety, depression, and behavioral problems in children.
The playroom contains carefully selected materials: sandtray and miniatures, dollhouses, art supplies, puppets, and imaginative play objects. In non-directive play therapy, the child leads the play while the therapist provides a safe, accepting presence and reflects what they observe. In directive play therapy, the therapist introduces specific activities targeting identified concerns. Either way, the therapist tracks themes, patterns, and emotional content emerging through play.
A child who witnessed domestic violence, for example, might use dollhouse figures to reenact frightening scenes—not to re-traumatize but to gain mastery, experimenting with different outcomes and processing overwhelming experiences in manageable doses. This looks nothing like adult talk therapy, yet it’s doing the same therapeutic work through developmentally appropriate means.
ERP is a specialized form of CBT designed specifically for OCD and anxiety disorders involving avoidance and compulsive behaviors. We emphasize “specialized” because standard CBT, while helpful for many anxiety presentations, is not sufficient for OCD. If your child has been diagnosed with OCD, you should specifically seek an ERP-trained therapist.
For comprehensive information about this condition, see our page on OCD treatment for children.
ERP involves creating a hierarchy of feared situations—from mildly anxiety-provoking to highly distressing—and gradually exposing the child to these triggers while preventing the compulsive response. This feels counterintuitive. Why would we deliberately trigger anxiety?
The answer lies in how OCD works: compulsions provide temporary relief but reinforce the disorder. Each time a child washes their hands to reduce contamination anxiety, they learn that the anxiety was intolerable and the compulsion was necessary. ERP breaks this cycle by demonstrating that anxiety naturally decreases without the compulsion—a process called habituation.
Sessions involve collaborative exposure planning, practicing in-session with therapist support, and homework exposures between sessions. Parents play a crucial role in reducing accommodation (participating in rituals or modifying routines to help the child avoid triggers) and supporting exposures at home.
Sometimes a child’s struggles aren’t primarily about skill deficits or symptom management—they’re about the fundamental sense of safety and trust in relationships. Attachment-informed therapy focuses on repairing the caregiver-child relationship and building what clinicians call a “secure base.”
These approaches often involve parent-child dyadic work—sessions where the parent and child are together, with the therapist guiding interactions that promote attunement, repair ruptures, and build connection. The focus is less on teaching specific coping skills and more on reshaping relational patterns and internalized working models of relationships.
Sometimes a child’s symptoms serve a function within family patterns, or family dynamics maintain the problem even when individual therapy makes progress. Family systems therapy addresses the child within the context of the entire family unit.
Sessions typically include multiple family members—parents, siblings, sometimes extended family. The therapist observes interaction patterns, identifies communication breakdowns, explores how each person’s behavior affects others, and guides the family toward healthier dynamics. The “identified patient” (the child) may actually be expressing family-wide stress.
While parent coaching teaches parents strategies to implement at home, family therapy does therapeutic work on the interaction patterns themselves. Both are valuable—they serve different purposes.
The following table provides a quick reference for comparing these modalities across key dimensions. Use it as a starting point, not a final answer—your child’s specific presentation requires clinical evaluation.
Modality: CBT – Typical Age Range: 7+ years – Best For: Anxiety, depression, behavioral concerns with cognitive component – Session Focus: Thought records, coping skills, behavioral experiments – Parent Involvement: Moderate—reinforcing skills at home – Not Ideal For: Pre-verbal children, severe trauma, OCD, attachment issues
Modality: DBT – Typical Age Range: 12-19 years – Best For: Self-harm, emotional crises, severe dysregulation – Session Focus: Skills training (mindfulness, distress tolerance, emotion regulation, interpersonal) – Parent Involvement: High—often in skills group together – Not Ideal For: General anxiety, typical teen moodiness, younger children
Modality: Play Therapy – Typical Age Range: 3-9 years – Best For: Trauma, expression difficulties, adjustment, young children – Session Focus: Child-led or directed play, symbolic processing – Parent Involvement: Moderate—consultation and possibly filial sessions – Not Ideal For: OCD, older children preferring structured approaches
Modality: ERP – Typical Age Range: All ages (adapted) – Best For: OCD, anxiety with significant avoidance/compulsions – Session Focus: Exposure hierarchy, response prevention – Parent Involvement: High—reducing accommodation, supporting exposures – Not Ideal For: Non-OCD anxiety that responds to standard CBT
Modality: Attachment-Informed – Typical Age Range: All ages – Best For: Relational trauma, early disruptions, insecure attachment – Session Focus: Dyadic work, attunement, relationship repair – Parent Involvement: Very high—often in session together – Not Ideal For: Skill deficits without relational foundation issues
Modality: Family Systems – Typical Age Range: All ages – Best For: Family conflict, patterns maintaining symptoms, divorce adjustment – Session Focus: Whole-family sessions, interaction pattern work – Parent Involvement: Central—family members are in therapy – Not Ideal For: Individual skill-building, specific disorders requiring specialized treatment
For a broader overview of therapy types for children, this resource provides additional context on common approaches.
When you’re evaluating a therapist, these questions help you understand their approach and whether it fits your child’s needs:
These questions position you as an informed participant in your child’s care—not challenging the therapist’s expertise, but collaborating in the decision.
Research consistently shows that the therapeutic alliance—the quality of the relationship between therapist and client—often matters more than specific technique. A warm, skilled therapist practicing a reasonably appropriate approach may outperform a technically correct but poor-fit therapist practicing the “ideal” modality.
This is especially true for adolescents, who are developmentally primed to notice authenticity and may disengage from a therapist who feels clinical or judgmental, regardless of their credentials.
However, modality specificity is non-negotiable in certain situations:
The balance is this: within the boundaries of appropriate modality, prioritize fit. Outside those boundaries—when a specific approach is clinically indicated—prioritize the right treatment even if it means finding a different therapist.

We know that navigating therapy options feels overwhelming, especially when you’re already worried about your child. Our hope is that this guide gives you the framework to participate meaningfully in treatment decisions—not to replace clinical expertise, but to engage with it productively.
At our practice, we offer multiple individual therapy approaches because we understand that children’s needs vary. The right approach depends on your child’s age, their presenting concerns, their capacity for different types of therapeutic work, and what’s happening in your family context. That matching process is exactly what clinical consultation is designed to accomplish.
If you’re uncertain which approach fits your child, we encourage you to seek a consultation where a clinician can hear your specific situation and provide recommendations. Come prepared with the questions above. Notice whether the therapist’s explanation makes sense and whether you feel heard. Trust that asking for clarity is not challenging their expertise—it’s being an advocate for your child.
Your child’s path through therapy is ultimately unique, and treatment plans often evolve as understanding deepens. But starting with an appropriate modality, delivered by a well-trained therapist in the context of a strong therapeutic relationship, gives your child the best foundation for meaningful change. That’s what we work toward with every family we serve.
Not necessarily. It often means the previous modality was not a good match or the therapist was not using a specialized approach where it is needed, for example OCD without ERP or severe emotional dysregulation without DBT. A fresh clinical assessment focused on modality matching can help you decide whether to adjust the approach, the therapist, or both.
Ask what modality they primarily practice and their training in it, why they think that approach fits your child’s specific concerns, what sessions will actually look like, how you will know it is working and on what timeline, when they would consider switching modalities, and what your role as a parent will be in the process.
The right modality depends on your child’s age, main concerns (anxiety, OCD, trauma, emotional outbursts, attachment), how well they can talk about thoughts and feelings, and what is happening in your family dynamics. Instead of picking a type by name, use these factors as a framework and ask any therapist to explain why a specific approach fits your child’s situation.
Younger children and kids who struggle to verbalize often do best with play therapy or attachment-informed, relationship-based work rather than traditional talk therapy. These approaches use play and parent-child interactions as the child’s language, allowing them to process experiences and emotions without relying on complex verbal skills.
Modality becomes non-negotiable when the problem is OCD (which requires ERP), severe or complex trauma (which needs trauma-informed work), or suicidal or self-harming teens (who benefit from safety-focused approaches like DBT). In these cases, warmth and rapport are important, but you also need a therapist trained in the right method.
You don’t have to keep guessing. With the right tools and support, parenting can feel easier—and your child can thrive.
Book a Free Consultation